Monday, April 02, 2007

Pesach Thoughts 5767: Slavery, Freedom and 21st Century Israel


I remember learning about how the Haggadah actually edits out any mention of the land of Israel in the Exodus story. Whereas the Torah explains that the specific reason for bringing the people out of slavery was to bring them into the land of milk and honey, the Haggadah makes no mention of this at all.
The editor probably did this to maintain 'Zman Cherutenu' as a meaningful festival – because if Pesach is about coming into Israel, then how can a 16th Century Polish Jew reading the story in the shadow of a potential pogrom truly celebrate our journey from slavery to liberation without being miserable? Marking our victory of the few against totalitarianism, inspiring; celebrating political independence, depressing.

Yet if the aim of the Exodus was coming to Israel, then why do we sing Dayenu, it would have been enough? If the sole reason was to come to the land, how can we say it would have been enough if we would have stayed in the desert? If we were brought out of Egypt to become an am Chofshi Beartzenu, how can it be enough if the sea wouldn’t have parted?

The answer, in my opinion, goes to the heart of what Zionism is. Because even if the ideal isn’t achieved we should still be prepared to give thanks for the steps along the way. We should still be grateful even if our life, our dreams, the State we want to build are incomplete. Just as the Rabbis of the Talmud were prepared to say Grace after Meals when they weren’t fully satiated, so the Yishuv were prepared to embrace a State even when its borders weren’t fully viable. At its core, Zionism is the ability to be grateful over incompleteness, the ability to give thanks, even when our dreams aren't fully fulfilled.

The Exodus story has always been reinterpreted to be meaningful and as individuals and as a nation, we need to think about things that enslave us (in my case, Avadim Hayinu Le’internet …) and how we can achieve our own personal liberation. In the 20th Century, Jewish Communists celebrated being liberated from Capitalism, Jewish feminists celebrated liberation from patriarchy and early Zionists marked being free from exile and anti Semitism. Even Martin Luther King used Yetziat Mitzrayim as a paradigm for the African American struggle for equal rights.

21st century Israelis meanwhile need to take a minute to think of those in our own society who remain 'enslaved', whether they be eastern European women sold as sex slaves in the Negev, Ghanaian or Chinese workers oppressed by unscrupulous bosses in Tel Aviv or homeless Gush Katif farmers seemingly forgotten by the government. The festival of freedom demands us not to close our eyes to our neighbour, even when they are a different colour, gender, religion or political persuasion to us. And as long as these injustices exist, our Israeli journey isn’t complete.

Yet this morning as I went to burn my pittot in our local park, saw the excitement on the faces of the children in my secular neighbourhood as they threw crumbs into the flames, saw the Chag Kasher VeSameach sign instead of ‘full’ and ‘spaces’ in the North Tel Aviv car park, it reminded me of how far we have come since the days of the fear of pogroms. Where else in the world can Jewish children experience Pesach in true freedom? And in what other generation would retelling a journey that begins in slavery and ends in independence in our own land not make the Haggadah depressing but liberating?

We haven’t reached the end of our own story of creating a truly egalitarian and equal society living in our Bibilical homeland in peace with our neighbours. But we’re on a journey, and I’m grateful enough to say Dayenu.

Chag Kasher VeSameach

Sunday, March 25, 2007

To Build or to Elbow? That is the Question

Reut recently asked me and other olim from work to attend a discussion about our Aliya experiences. I spoke about the different perspectives between an oleh and an immigrant (between the person who comes to Israel expecting a free ride and the one who expects a constant uphill struggle) as well as the difficulty of maintaining our tolerant and polite upbringing in a region where that can make you a freier, a sucker. Meanwhile, a French-German friend actually discussed her efforts to shed her Europeaness and embrace being Israeli instead. Another colleague, originally from New Jersey, mentioned the advice an Israeli cab driver gave him which he still uses today; that in Israel you have to Lidchof UleHidachef – to push, and then push a bit more (use your elbows) to get by here.

I doubt the taxi driver knew this, but his advice contrasted to the ideology of the early Bilu pioneers, who came to Israel in the 1880s not to Lidchof UlHidachef but to Livnot UleHibanot, to build the land and to be built through it.


Sometimes I wonder what those early Chalutzim would think of modern day Israel. The technology, immigration and strong economy on the one hand, but also the poverty, lack of peace and the perception of wide scale corruption on the other. Modern day Israeli icons such as writer Etgar Keret or singer Aviv Gefen don’t idealize traditional Israeli symbols like the army while Meretz MK Haim Oron recently quipped that while his generation wanted Israel to be a 'success story', for his children its enough if its merely a 'story'.

Certainly disappointment towards our leaders reflects a situation in which we have long stopped being built through the land and begun to use our elbows instead. One concerned citizen even published an obituary notice in Ha’aretz for the State of Israel - not because he mourns its establishment, but simply what it’s become.

And yet within the plethora of elbows and ambivalence, small things always happen that tilt the balance back a bit…

Walking to the bus stop after a night out, the number 26 (which comes every 30 mins and takes me straight home) drove past. Seeing it stop at a traffic light fifty yards in front of me, I ran, knocked on the door, and made a pleading gesture with my hand. Despite Israeli rules that doors are only opened at bus stops, my hand signal (or just general charm) must have won out because the bus driver let me on.

It is tough here, and I still worry that someone who doesn’t use their elbows won’t manage in this small Middle Eastern country. But every now and then, stories like the number 26 bus repay, however slightly, my faith that Lidchof UleHidachef isn’t always the way things have to be here. Every now and then, it’s good to know that manners and politeness do have advantages with people, and that being pleasant and friendly doesn’t always make you a freier.


And that even stories such as Etgar Keret’s The Bus Driver who wanted to be God reflect a human side within the greater scale of life’s disenchantment.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Hoping for a modern day Purim miracle

Purim is always a joyous time in Israel – and why not? Set in Persia a couple of millennia ago, full of topsy tervy roller coaster changes from one moment to the next where nothing is exactly as it seems, the story depicts the plan by an evil man heading a regional power who plotted to wipe us out. Yet when all seemed lost, the Jewish people were suddenly saved by Queen Esther, our quintessential Jewish heroine. Despite God's name never appearing in the book, the Rabbis understood Him to be busy working behind the scenes in mysterious ways to plan our redemption, even when we feared imminent destruction.

While these days you don't have to look far to find an evil Persian looking to destroy us, the only Esther currently making the Israeli news is actually an Esterina (Tartman), an MK for the Yisrael Beitenu party who came to prominence when she compared the appointment of the first Arab Muslim minister in Israel's history to taking an axe to the tree of Zionism exclaiming that"We need to destroy this affliction from within ourselves. God willing, God will come to our help."

This week, in their infinite wisdom, those running the country decided that she would make an excellent candidate for bringing more visitors to Israel and that she should therefore fill the vacant post of Tourism Minister.


Recent decisions have certainly provided a lot of laughter, but more at the stupidity of the Government decision makers than anything else. In addition to the proposed appointment of Tartman was the picture of our Defense Minister, the man charged with protecting us against outside threats looking through binoculars…with the lens cap still on.

If it wasn't true, these events would bring a bit of much needed Purim cheer. Unfortunately Israel's political system means we are stuck for now with a Defense Minister who has lost all authority and a Tourism Minister known more for her view on Arabs than how to make Israel an attractive place for visitors. Even if such a person does bear a passing resemblance to Angelina Jolie, I know of no other country in the world where someone who carries around a firearm be asked to convince potential tourists that the country is safe.

The up side is that Purim teaches us that things can change for the better in an instant, and that just because all seems lost doesn’t mean we should expect the worst. I just hope that like 2,000 years ago, there is a hidden hand here somewhere guiding us all towards salvation. To paraphrase our new Minister, 'God willing, God will come to our help.'

Happy Purim
:)

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Presidents, Ambassadors & Astronauts - the Israel that could be...

It hasn’t been a great month for Israelis. The Chief of Staff resigned, the State Prosecutor opened a probe into allegations against the PM, and the President is about to be indicted for rape. In an amazing speech, Katsav compared himself to Albert Dreyfus subsequently blaming the ‘elites’ – the courts, the police and the media for carrying out a witch hunt, and concluding that this signaled the end of Zionism. Writing from the World Economic Forum at Davos, Sever Plocker questioned whether things could be any worse explaining that “Israel is no longer viewed as a thriving, high tech superpower or even as a brutal occupation power…but as a declining and dysfunctional country…a country of rapists and corruption at high levels, a country that is falling into moral decline.”

Katsav is not the only one discussing the end of the Zionist dream. Even without Ahmadinejad’s threats (predictions?) that Israel is a 'rotten dried tree' that will be blown away, more and more Israelis have begun to speak about the end of life the way we know it. Historian Benny Morris recently published a chilling article discussing the inevitability of a future nuclear Holocaust while Deputy Defense Minister Efraim Sneh claimed that Iran attaining nuclear capability could kill the Zionist dream without even pushing a button. And ignoring the wealth of Zionist thinkers from Jabotinsky to Magnes that promoted Israeli Arabs living alongside Jews, Esterina Tartman from Yisrael Beitenu described the appointment of Israel's first Muslim Minister as the beginning of assimilation and the end of Zionism.

It’s hardly surprising that at such a time the Israeli ‘Patriotism Survey’ reflected an unprecedented decline in the public’s confidence in government institutions. But what is interesting is that at the same time, the Survey showed an increased emotional affinity for the State. Despite the gloomy predictions and lack of faith in Israel’s leadership, a whopping 87% of Israelis will encourage their children to stay here.

I remember watching the first series of ‘The Ambassador’ - an Israeli reality TV show based on PR - when the future winner Eytan Schwartz refused to justify soldiers at a checkpoint forcing a Palestinian to play them the violin. The show being about explaining Israel’s actions, the judges were dumfounded – how can an ‘Ambassador’ refuse to defend the actions of his state? Eytan answered that the Israel he defends is not necessarily the Israel that is, but the Israel that is supposed to be, the Israel described in the Declaration of Independence…and if it doesn’t live up to these (lofty) standards, the patriotic thing to do is not to defend or explain Israel but to speak out.

Last weekend Rachel and I celebrated our engagement in Jerusalem. And against the background of disillusionment and insecurity many people feel, I actually believe that getting married and looking to buy a house represents a kind of ideological statement - the putting down of roots, a show of faith in our people’s future here, a clear statement of where we intend to live our lives. And I actually think there’s something very Jewish about that – that when times seem bad, when the future’s uncertain, that’s when Jews not only express their faith that a better society is possible but their belief that they will be around to be a part of it.


The first of February marks the Yahrzeit of an Israeli who encapsulated all the best this country has to offer. The child of Holocaust survivors, a scientist who excited and united the whole nation with his mission, a pilot who helped stop Iraq going nuclear, a secular Israeli who wanted to keep Kosher and Shabbat in space, Ilan Ramon’s shuttle burnt up on its re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere four years ago this week. And as the President waits for an Emil Zola who probably won't arrive, normal patriotic Israelis who love this country are trying to follow in the footsteps of a real Israeli hero and ambassador, pledging their future here and demonstrating their belief in the idea that the Israel that currently is, isn’t necessarily the Israel that could be… and planning on being around long enough to try and facilitate that much needed change.

Monday, December 25, 2006

Brothers in Arms?


I never thought I'd see the day when Bibi Netanyahu supports peace talks whilst long time dove Shimon Peres is against. Truth is, discussions over peace with Syria aren’t that simple – things rarely are in the Middle East; but Bashar Assad's offer to start negotiations without preconditions has got everyone arguing and throwing in their two pennies. I don’t see why I should be any different.

There are clear strategic reasons for ignoring Bashar's pleas – Syria's regime is in trouble and its Alawite minority rule looks increasingly threatened in the face of international isolation. And as Head of Mossad Meir Dagan said recently, initiating dialogue with Syria would not only be a stab in the back of the moderate Arab States, but to our friends the U.S aswell.

There are also strong emotional attachments to the Golan. As Arik Bachar wrote last week in Yediot Acharonot, the public loves the area so much that the chance a referendum on giving back the Heights would pass is currently about as high as the Teheran Conference concluding that the Shoah actually happened.

And why shouldn’t Israelis love the Golan - its beautiful, peaceful, quiet. It's populated by good ideological people. There aren’t any demographic issues like in the territories; very few Arabs, no Intifada; no rocks or Kassams are being fired…

All in all, it’s a bit like the Sinai was in 1971, two years before the Yom Kippur War.


And that’s what worries me…Because if we aren’t prepared to discuss the future of a place when (or specifically because) its quiet, we may well be forced to discuss its future when its not. How can we convince our neighbours that Israelis don’t just understand force when we reject negotiations during peacetime?

And what will we say to the next Commission of Inquiry that assesses why we lost hundreds of soldiers in what may well be an unnecessary conflict with Syria?

Sunday, December 10, 2006

Zionism and Looking on the Bright Side

A conversation with a colleague’s father last week got me thinking. A businessman based in Israel but who travels abroad, he told me that his impression is many Israelis feel very negatively about the future. To be honest, when you spend all day cooped up with other analysts ‘thinking’ about future political trends, it’s very difficult to have your finger on the pulse of the average Israeli. But deep down, I think he’s right – since last summer’s war, there has been a loss of confidence in the government and state institutions. And many people are increasingly anxious and depressed about the future.

Before I made Aliya friends from the Embassy gave me a book called the Xenophobes guide to Israelis; It’s the type of book that prepares you for dealing with Israelis, you know, “every Israeli you meet has, by his own repute, spent his army years in a top combat unit (when in fact he was a cook in a base situated 100 metres from his home). Israelis will say they run an ‘intimate boutique’ (underwear store) ‘manage a transportation business’ (drive a taxi) or ‘own a new executive automobile (a 1979 Volvo, recently acquired, hence ‘new’ to the owner)”

Curiously enough, there does seem to be an Israeli characteristic of exaggeration. Pre-election people felt Bibi was a loser who destroyed the country’s poor; 3 months later he was the most popular leader in Israel. 6 months ago, a civilian was the ideal candidate for Defence Minister; now we are lining up ex generals to replace him. In the first days of the second Lebanon war we kicked arse, yet a fortnight later we suffered a humiliating defeat. As former Defence Minister
Moshe Arens recently wrote “What is it about Israelis? Are they just plain fickle or do they have a problem making up their minds? Like a pendulum, their opinions and moods swing back and forth.”

2 weeks ago was the 29th November. And in addition to being a Jerusalem road where Olmert used to live, the date signifies the UN 1947 partition plan for Mandatory Palestine. Despite their reservations, the Ben Gurion led Yishuv accepted the plan. It wasn’t ideal by any means, wasn’t what the Jews had dreamed of. It didn’t even include Jerusalem as part of the proposed State. But in many ways, I think the acceptance of the partition plan is what Zionism is about – being satisfied with something less than our dreams – and making reasoned decisions of what is achievable at any particular time given the circumstances.

For Israeli’s it seems, our country is either the best or the worst, either the most moral army in the world or an evil occupier; a tourist's dream or a constant target of terrorism. But its the in-between, that grey area, the part where subtleties exist, where real life plays out. And if we are constantly oscillating between extremes how will we be able to make rational choices about our future?

In a post war column in the New York Times, Tom Friedman wrote that “Listening to the post-Lebanon-war debate in Israel leaves me wanting to say just one thing to Israelis: Get a grip on! Israel is behaving like it lost the Lebanon war and now needs to tear itself apart, limb by limb, with investigations and new elections… As [Nasrallah] put it in an interview on Lebanon's NTV, ''If I had known on July 11 that the operation would lead to such a war, would I do it? I say no, absolutely not.'' Even he doesn't think he won.”

The economy is also testifying to peoples’ faith in the future. Israel is one of
Donald Trump's favorite places in the world and the Tel Aviv Stock market has jumped 22% since the end of the war. Despite interest rates going down, the Shekel is up against the dollar. And businessmen don’t invest because they have romantic ideas about an ancient people reborn in their historic homeland – they do it because they want to make money. They do it because they believe Israel is stable and has a strong future.

We live in a great country, in historic times. And of course we have problems, and unless we are careful and wise, the geo strategic balance of power may turn against us. We may well be left to confront Iran alone and the Palestinians are not turning into members of Chovavei Tzion any time soon. But classical Zionism is about seeing the grey and embracing the incompleteness of having a State in real life rather than in our utopian dreams, about taming our tendencies to exaggerate.

It’s about trying, in these very difficult and challenging times, to get a grip on and be thankful for what we have.



footnote - a week after this post, I read the following article by Yair Lapid sarcastically discussing the Israeli love of polls and superficiality of public opinion. "Not once in four years, not because you learned the material, not because you gathered all the information. Now, right now, vote now, with one click, without hesitating, because the lines are going to close very shortly. Trust yourselves, go with your gut feelings, instinct replaced intellect long ago. Only you understand the question of who is best suited to be defense minister, finance minister, justice minister. Only you know who is best suited to lead his soldiers into Bint Jbeil."

Thursday, November 09, 2006

The only parade in the village


Much has been written this past week about the Gay Pride parade that is due to take place tomorrow in Jerusalem. Yet in many ways the argument is over more than just whether members of the ‘homeo lesbit community’ as they are called here, have a right to walk through parts of Jerusalem – it touches on what it means to live in a Jewish and Democratic State not governed by Halacha.

Every democracy has to be based on some sort of compromise between universalism and particularism, between the freedom to do how we please on the one hand and the importance of not harming or offending others on the other - or in Israel's case between the values of equality and traditional Jewish custom. And it leads to legitimate questions over the location of the event, whether we should use our understanding of the Torah as an objective moral compass, or whether it’s consistent that a fuss is made over an annual gay parade whilst weekly public Shabbat desecration at Teddy Stadium is ignored.

Last week someone graffitied a shul in Tel Aviv with the words ‘if we don’t march in Jerusalem, you wont walk in Tel Aviv.’ And whilst vandalising any place of worship is completely unacceptable, it raised an interesting point; because if being outwardly gay in the holy city of Jerusalem is offensive, maybe being openly religious in the secular and hedonistic city of Tel Aviv is equally unacceptable. And if a parade in November in Jerusalem can cause tyre burning and kabbalistic curses, what might Simchat Torah in Tel Aviv lead to…

But one thing is certain – the moment any event is cancelled due to fear of aggression and threats, we find ourselves on an extremely slippery slope. Because what message does it give to people unhappy with the decision making structure of the State? And if a parade can be cancelled by violence, then so can any other controversial policy – whether that’s throwing away Ethiopian (and British) blood, discrimination against Israeli Arabs or evacuation of settlements and outposts. Because the moment people think change can be affected better by crisis than by compromise, by demonisation rather than by dialogue, Israel is in danger of becoming a country that is a lot more dangerous to live in.

And regardless of one’s sexual or religious orientation, that’s not good news for anybody.